Penerapan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Merupakan Hasil Tindak Pidaka Narkotika (Studi Putusan Nomor 311/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn.Mdn)

Abstract

Money laundering is a crime that has different characteristics from the types of crime in general, especially that this crime is not a single crime but a double crime. Multiple crimes, which means that money laundering consists of predicate crime and money laundering as a crime (follow up crime). However, between the main crime and money laundering crime is a crime that stands alone (as a separate crime). The problems discussed in this skripsi are regarding the legal arragements governing the crime of money laundering if the original crime has not been decided and the judge’s consideration in decision number 311/Pid.Sus/ 2018/PN.Mdn in dropping the decision of the crime of money laundering which is the result of narcotics. The method used in writing is the is the method of collecting data with Library Research, namely research conducted based on reading sources, is laws, books, scientific articles, mass media, and legal journals relating to material discussed in this skripsi. Field research (Field Research) that is by conducting direct research in the field to obtain data, in this case the researcher directly conducts research into the Medan District Court , in case the writer examines the case in accordance with the proposed tittle. The results of this study are the legal proceedings against money laundering if the original crime has not been decided is regulated in article 69 of Law number 8 year 2010 which states that to be able to carry out investigations, prosecution, examination in court hearings against criminal acts of money laundering are not mandatory proven beforehand the original crime. Judge’s consideration in issuing a money laundering decision which is the result of a narcotics crime in decision number 311/Pid.Sus/ 2018/PN.Mdn is based on juridical conderations and non-juridical considerations.