Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Penyalahgunaan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa (Studi Kasus Putusan No.01/Pid.Sus.TPK/2016/PN.Mdn)

Abstract

Corruption was systematic and widespread, not only financial harm and the country's economy, but also a violation of the rights of the social and economic society at large, so it is classified as an extraordinary crime that eradication should be done in a way that is remarkable. The impact of corruption over the years, in addition to harming national finance and economy, also inhibits the growth and sustainability of national development that demands high efficiency. The problem in this research is how accountability for perpetrators of corruption in the abuse of procurement of goods and services and how the consideration of judges in decisions on criminal fraud together in the Decision No.01 / Pid.B.Sus-TPK / 2016 / PN.Mdn. The purpose of this study was to obtain answers to the issues discussed. Methods The study was a Research Library (Library Research). This method to conduct research on a variety of reading materials written by scholars that books theory of law, magazines law, legal journals and materials studies and regulations on the crime and Field Research (Field Research) is to do spaciousness in this case the direct authors conducted a study on the Medan District Court to take a decision relating to the title of the thesis is about the criminal fraud cases together, namely decision No.01 / Pid.B.Sus-TPK / 2016 / PN.Mdn , Accountability of perpetrators in the Decision No.01 / Pid.B.Sus-TPK / 2016 / PN.Mdn Aris Fadillah Acheen, ST, M.Si found guilty of corruption together, dropping imprisonment for 1 (one) year 8 (eight) months imprisonment and a fine of Rp. 50.000.000, - (fifty million rupiah) can be replaced if it is not paid for two months of captivity, as well as pay compensation amounting to Rp. 40.000.000, - (forty million) on condition that if the compensation is not paid within one month after the verdict that his possessions be confiscated and where possessions are not sufficient it will be replaced with two months in prison, set the defendant remain in custody. Legal Considerations The judge in the verdict against corruption abuse of procurement of goods and services (Study of Medan District Court's Decision No. 01 / Pid.Sus.TPK / 2016 / PN. Mdn) on Behalf of Defendant Aris Fadillah Acheen by Judge Anticorruption Court on Medan District court, Considering the aggravating factors that the defendant did not heed the government program to combat corruption, as well as things that relieve the accused to be polite during the trial, the defendant realized his mistake and the defendant has not been convicted