Perbedaan Perilaku Prososial Remaja Ditinjau Dari Lingkungan (Desa dan Kota)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Perbedaan Perilaku Prososial Remaja Ditinjau dari Lingkungan (Desa dan Kota) jumlah sampel dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 45 orang remaja. Adapun teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Insidental adalah teknik penentuan sampel berdasarkan kebetulan. Skala dalam penelitian ini disusun berdasarkan aspek prososial menurut Mussen dkk (dalam Rufaida, 2009) aspek-aspek perilaku prososial antara lain :Berbagi (sharing), Menolong (helping), Kerjasama (cooperating), Bertindak jujur (honesty), Berderma (donating), Mempertimbangkan kesejahteraan orang lain. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan dari Analisis varian 1 jalur, diketahui terdapat perbedaan prososial ditinjau dari domisili remaja di desa dan dikota. Hasil ini diketahui dengan melihat nilai atau koefisien perbedaan dengan koefisien F = 181.801.574 dengan p = 0.000, < 0,010. Berdasarkan hasil ini berarti hipotesis yang diajukan dinyatakan diterima. Berdasarkan table di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa prososial tergolong sedang dengan nilai rata rata hipotetik sebesar 140.00 dan nilai rata empirik146.600. hasil prososial remaja di desa tergolong sangat tinggi dengan nilai rata- rata empiric sebesar 171.809. hasil prososial remaja kota tergolong rendah dengan nilai rata-rata empiric sebesar 124.542. This study aims to determine the differences in adolescent prosocial behavior in terms of the environment (village and city). The number of samples in this study was 45 teenagers. The sampling technique used in this study is incidental, which is a sampling technique based on chance. The scale in this study is based on prosocial aspects according to Mussen et al (in Rufaida, 2009) aspects of prosocial behavior include: Sharing, Helping, Cooperation (cooperating), Acting honestly (honesty), Giving (donating). , consider the welfare of others. Based on the results of the calculation of the 1-way analysis of variance, it is known that there are prosocial differences in terms of the domicile of adolescents in the village and in the city. This result is known by looking at the value or coefficient of difference with a coefficient of F = 181.801,574 with p = 0.000, < 0.010. Based on these results, it means that the proposed hypothesis is accepted. Based on the table above, it can be concluded that prosocial is classified as moderate with a hypothetical average value of 140.00 and an empirical average value of 146,600. The prosocial outcomes of adolescents in the village are classified as very high with an empirical average value of 171,809. The prosocial outcomes of urban youth are low with an empirical mean value of 124.542.