Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Bagi Hasil Pohon Aren terhadap Petani dan Pemilik di Desa Juhar Ginting Sada Nioga

Abstract

Penelitianiini membahasimengenai pelaksanaaniperjanjian bagiihasil pohoniaren yang terdapat di Desa Juhar Ginting Sada Nioga. Adapun permasalahan yangimenjadi fokus dalamipenelitian iniiyaitu (1) Bagaimanakah pelaksanaan perjanjian bagiihasil pohon areniterhadap petani dan pemilik di Desa Juhar Ginting Sada Nioga? (2) Bagaimanakah akibat hukum jika salah satu pihak wanprestasi atas perjanjianibagi hasiipohon aren yangiterjadi diiDesa JuhariGinting Sada Nioga? (3) Bagaimanakah asas kepastian hukumpadiperjanjian bagi hasil pohon arenidi Desa JuhariGinting Sada Nioga berdasarkanihukum adatidaniUndang- UndangiNomor 2iTahun 1960iTentang PerjanjianiBagiiHasil? Penelitianiini bersifatideskriptifianalitis. Dataiyang terkumpulidianalisis dengan metode pendekataniyuridis empiris. Penelitianiini menyimpulkan bahwai (1) PelaksanaaniPerjanjian bagiihasil di Desa Juhar Ginting Sada Nioga dilakukan dengan cara perjanjian tidak tertulis atau lisan namun pelaksanaannyaidilakukan menurutiadat kebiasaan yangiada diimasyarakat tersebut. pembagian hasiliyang dilakukanimasyarakat diiDesaiJuhar GintingiSada Niogaitidak bertentanganidenganiUU No.2iTahun 1960, tetapiidalam halibentuk danijangka waktuiperjanjian bagiihasil tidakimemenuhi ketentuanisebagaimana yangidiatur dalamiundang-undangitersebut. (2)Akibatihukum yangiditimbulkan dariiwanprestasi yagiterjadi dalamipelaksaan perjanjianibagi hasilipohon arenidi Desa Juhar Gintig Sada Nioga biasanya hanya menurut hukum adat setempat yaitu ganti rugi dan pembatalan perjanjian bagi hasil. (3) Asas kepastian hukum terhadap perjanjian bagi hasil di Desa Juhar Ginting Sada Nioga belum diterapkan. Hal ini dikarenakan kurangnyaipengetahuanmasyarakatimengenai hukumiperjanjian bagiihasil sehinggaipara pelaksaaniperjanjian hanya melakukan perjanjian berdasarkan adat dan kebiasaan setempat. This research discusses theiimplementation ofithe agreementiof sharecroppingifor the productioniof palmitrees in Juhar Ginting Sada Nioga Village. The main questions of this research: (1) How is theiimplementation ofithe agreement ofisharecropping forithe production of palm trees to farmers and owners in Juhar Ginting Sada Nioga Village? (2) What were theilegal consequencesiif oneiof the partiesidefaults on the palm tree sharecropping agreement that occurs in Juhar Ginting Sada Nioga Village? (3) There was legal certainty on the implementation of the sharecropping agreement for palm trees in Juhar Ginting Sada Nioga Village based on “Hukum Adat” and “Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 1960” about Share Crop Agreements? This research is descriptive analytical. The data collected were analyzed using an empirical juridical method.This research found (1) The implementation of the share-crop agreement in Juhar Ginting Sada Nioga Village is carried out by way of an unwritten or oral agreement, but the implementation isicarried outiaccording toithe customs thatiexist initheicommunity. The share-cropping carried out by the community in Juhar Ginting Sada Nioga Village does not conflict withiUndang-UndangiNo. i2 Tahuni1960, but in terms ofithe formiand termiof the profit sharingiagreement it does not comply with the provisions stipulated in the law. (2) The legal consequences arising from defaults that occur inithe implementationiof theipalm treeishare cropping agreementiin Juhar Gintig Sada Nioga Village are usually only according to local customary law, namely compensation and cancellation of sharecropping agreements. (3) The principle of legal certainty regarding the sharecrooping agreement in Juhar Ginting Sada Nioga Village has not been applied. This is due tothe lack of public knowledge about the law of sharecropping agreements so that the implementersof the agreement only make agreements based on local customs and habits.