Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositori.uma.ac.id/handle/123456789/22300
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSyarif, Yance-
dc.contributor.advisorMarlan-
dc.contributor.authorSyahrizal, Edi-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T02:39:22Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T02:39:22Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.uma.ac.id/handle/123456789/22300-
dc.description53 Halamanen_US
dc.description.abstractSejalan dengan berkembangnya tingkat pelayanan pada sistem kelistrikan semakin bertambah pula persoalan-persoalan yang timbul. Tuntutan terhadap keandalan suatu sistem, merupakan ha! yang tidak dapat diabaikan dalam meningkatkan pel ayanan dan pengoperasian yang lebih baik, oleh karenanya dibutuhkan jawaban atau jalan keluar untuk mengatasi persoalan yang timbul tersebut. Berdasarkan problem diatas, penulis berkeinginan untuk membahas perbandingan keuntungan dan kerngian menggnnakan lampn incadescent (pijar). Dirnana pada masa sekarang ini banyak digunakan oleb masyarakat kita, mnumnya kita kurang begitu mengetahui beberapa keuntungan dan kemgian antara pemakaian larnpu F'/ourescent dengan lampu Incandescent (pijar). Disinj akan dilakukan penganalisaan terhadap lampu Florescent jenis PLE-U dengan lampu Incandescent dengan intensitas cahaya yang hampir sama besarnya (lampu hemat energi 11 watt, 15 watt, 20 watt dan larnpu Incandescent 60 watt, 75 watt, dan 100 watt). Sebagai perbandingan digunakan lampu hemat energi l 5 watt dengan larnpu pijar 75 watt, dari basil perhitungan diketahui bahwa larnpu Flourescent lebih hern at Rp. 750 dari larnpu Incandescent dil ihat dari pernakaian selama satu bulan. In line with expanding service level electrics system progressively increase also problems of arising out. Demand to reliability system, representing matter which cannot be disregarded in improving better operation and service, for the reason required by way out or answer to overcome problem of arising out. Pursuant to problem above, wishful writer to study comparison of advantage and disadvantage use lamp of incandescent (bulb). Where at a period of this time used many by our society, generally we less so know some advantage and disadvantage between usage of lamp of fluorescent and lamp of Incandescent (bulb). Here will be conducted by analyzing to lamp of Florescent type of PLE-U with lamp of Incandescent with light intensity which much the same to level of (economical lamp of energy 11, 15, and 20 watt and lamp of Incandescent 60, 75, and 100 watt). As comparison used economical lamp of energy 15 watt with fluorescent lamp 75 watt, from result of calculation known that lamp of fluorescent more economical Rp . 750 from lamp of Incandescent seen from usage during one months.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Medan Areaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNPM;978120028-
dc.subjectperbandingan ekonomisen_US
dc.subjectlampu incandescenten_US
dc.subjectlampu plourescenten_US
dc.subjectbiaya rekening listriken_US
dc.subjecteconomic comparisonen_US
dc.subjectincandescent lampen_US
dc.subjectplourescent lampen_US
dc.subjectelectricity bill feesen_US
dc.titlePerbandingan Ekonomis Pemakaian Lampu Incandescent Dengan Lampu Plourescent Ditinjau dari Biaya Rekening Listriken_US
dc.title.alternativeEconomic Comparison of Using Incandescent Lamps with Pourescent Lamps in View of Electricity Bill Costsen_US
dc.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
Appears in Collections:SP - Electrical Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
978120028 - Edi Syahrizal - Fulltext.pdfCover, Abstract, Chapter I, II, III, V, Bibliography3.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
978120028 - Edi Syahrizal - Chapter IV.pdf
  Restricted Access
Chapter IV484.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.