Hubungan antara Dukungan Keluarga dengan Quarter Life Crisis pada Alumni Psikologi UMA

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat hubungan antara dukungan keluarga dengan quarter life crisis (qlc) pada alumni Psikologi UMA. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah alumni Psikologi UMA yang diwisuda Periode I dan II 2023 sejumlah 430 dan sampel yang digunakan 138 orang. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah Purposive Sampling. Pengambilan data menggunakan skala dukungan keluarga dan qlc. Hasil penelitian menggunakan teknik korelasi product moment (rxy) diketahui sebesar -0,634 dengan p = 0,000 < 0,05. Artinya, terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara dukungan keluarga dengan qlc sehingga hipotesis diterima. Berdasarkan analisis data, diketahui bahwa qlc tergolong tinggi dengan mean hipotetik 65 < mean empirik 89,13 selisihnya melebihi satu SD (15,331). Sementara, dukungan keluarga tergolong rendah dengan mean hipotetik 60 > mean empirik 46,31, selisihnya melebihi satu SD (9,119). Adapun besaran qlc dipengaruhi oleh dukungan keluarga sebesar 40,1%. Sisanya 59,9% dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain, seperti hubungan percintaan, pertemanan, tantangan akademis, serta kehidupan pekerjaan. This study aimed to look at the correlation between family support and quarter life crisis (qlc) in UMA Psychology alumni. The population in this study were UMA Psychology alumni wha gradualed in Pcriod I and II 2023 totaling 430 and the sample used was 138 people. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. Data collection using jamily support and qle scadles. The results of the study using the product moment correlation technique (rxy) were found to be -0.634 with p = 0.000 0.05. This means that there was a significant correlation between family support and qlc so that the hypothesis was accepted. Based on data analysis, it was known that qlc was high with a hypothetical mean of65 <empirical mean of 89.13 the difference exceeds one SD (15.331). Meanwhile,family support was low with a hypothetical mean of60> empirical mean of46.31.the difference exceeds one SD (9.119). The amount of qic was influenced by family support by 40.1%. The remaining 59.9% was influenced by other factors,such as romantic relationships, friendships, academic challenges, and work life.