Resiliensi pada Mantan Pecandu Narkoba di Panti Rehabilitasi

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran resiliensi pada mantan pecandu narkoba di Panti Rehabilitasi Islami Syar‟I Narkotika Khalid Bin Walid. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan fenomenologis. Pengumpulan data menggunakan pedoman wawancara dan pedoman observasi, Analisis data menggunakan organisasi data, coding, dan interpretasi. Responden penelitian ini sebanyak 3 (tiga) orang. Usia masing-masing responden yaitu responden pertama berusia 36 (tigapuluh enam) tahun, responden kedua berusia 25 (dua puluh lima) tahun, responden ketiga berusia 29 (dua puluh Sembilan) tahun. Paradigma penelitian ini dilihat dari faktor yang mempengaruhi, aspek, proses, tahapan, dan ciri-ciri individu yang memiliki resiliensi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa resiliensi responden pertama sudah berada di tahap thriving (berkembang pesat), responden kedua berada di tahap recovery (pemulihan) menuju thriving (berkembang pesat), responden ketiga berada di tahap thriving (berkembang pesat). Berdasarkan hal tersebut responden 1 dan 3 sudah mencapai tahap akhir resiliensi yaitu thriving (berkembang pesat), sementara responden 2 sedang dalam proses mencapai tahap akhir resiliensi. This research aimed to describe the resilience of former drug addicts at the Islamic Rehabilitation Center Syar'l Narkotika Khalid Bin Walid. This research used a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. Data collection was carried out using interview and observation guidelines. Data analysis im·olved data organization, coding, and i11te1pretation. 7'lie respondents in this study consisted of three individuals. The ages of the respo11dents were as follows: the first respondent was 36 years old, the second respondent was 25 years old, and the third respondent was 2Y years old. The research paradigm examined the factors il?f111e11cing resilience, as well as the aspects. processes. stages, and characteristics of individuals with resilience. The results indicated that the first respondent had reached the thriving stage, the second respondent was in the recovery stage heading toward the thriving stage, and the third re5pondent was in the thriving stage. Based on these findings, respondents 1 and 3 had reached the final stage of resilience, which is thriving, whi/.e respo11dent 2 was in the process of reaching the final stage of resilience.