Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Tindak Pidana Kelalaian yang Menyebabkan Orang Lain Luka Berat (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negri Pematang Siantar: NO.51/PID.B/2021/PN PMS)

Abstract

Skripsi ini meneliti tinjauan yuridis terhadap pertimbangan hakim dalam tindak pidana kelalaian yang mengakibatkan luka berat, khususnya Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pematang Siantar Nomor 51/Pid.B/2021/PN.PMS. Latar belakang penelitian ini dilandasi oleh pentingnya pertanggungjawaban pidana atas kelalaian yang berdampak serius dan perlunya analisis mendalam terhadap pertimbangan hakim dalam kasus tersebut. Rumusan masalahnya meliputi pengaturan hukum tindak pidana kelalaian yang menyebabkan luka berat dan analisis pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam putusan yang diteliti. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur hukum, dan putusan pengadilan. Pembahasan meliputi pengaturan hukum tindak pidana kelalaian dalam KUHP lama dan baru, faktor-faktor penyebab kelalaian, dampak tindak pidana kelalaian, prosedur pemeriksaan perkara di Pengadilan Negeri Pematang Siantar, serta analisis yuridis putusan Nomor 51/Pid.B/2021/PN.PMS. Analisis tersebut meliputi kronologi kasus, dakwaan jaksa, pertimbangan hakim, dan bunyi putusan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan tersebut telah mempertimbangkan unsur-unsur tindak pidana kelalaian dan menerapkan asas proporsionalitas serta individualisasi dalam menjatuhkan hukuman. Namun, penelitian juga merekomendasikan peningkatan edukasi hukum, evaluasi faktor eksternal penyebab kelalaian, dan integrasi pendekatan restorative justice. This thesis examines the legal review of judicial considerations in negligence criminal acts resulting in serious injury, specifically focusing on the Pematang Siantar District Court Decision No. 51/Pid.B/2021/PN.PMS. The background of this research is based on the importance of criminal accountability for negligence with serious consequences and the need for an in-depth analysis of the judge's considerations in this case. The research questions include the legal regulation of negligence criminal acts causing serious injury and an analysis of the judge's legal considerations in the decision under review. The research method used is normative juridical, employing secondary data in the form of legislation, legal literature, and court decisions. The discussion covers the legal regulation of negligence criminal acts in the old and new Criminal Codes (KUHP), the factors causing negligence, the impact of negligence criminal acts, the procedures for examining the case in the Pematang Siantar District Court, and a juridical analysis of Decision No. 51/Pid.B/2021/PN.PMS. This analysis includes the chronology of the case, the prosecutor's indictment, the judge's considerations, and the wording of the decision. The research concludes that the judge's considerations in the decision have considered the elements of negligence criminal acts and applied the principles of proportionality and individualization in sentencing. However, the research also recommends improvements in legal education, evaluation of external factors causing negligence, and the integration of a restorative justice approach.