Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositori.uma.ac.id/handle/123456789/31190
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHasibuan, Samsul Abdul Rahman Sidik-
dc.contributor.authorPrayuda, Hakas-
dc.contributor.authorAlisibramulisi, Anizahyati-
dc.contributor.authorAdnan, Suraya Hani-
dc.contributor.authorHussin, Tengku Anita Raja-
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-08T03:47:44Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-08T03:47:44Z-
dc.date.issued2025-06-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.uma.ac.id/handle/123456789/31190-
dc.description14 Halamanen_US
dc.description.abstractEnhancing seismic resilience is a critical priority in contemporary structural engineering, particularly for buildings located in earthquake-prone regions. Flat slab systems are increasingly adopted due to their architectural flexibility and construction efficiency; however, their inherent flexibility can reduce lateral stiffness, thereby compromising seismic performance. Drop panels—localized slab thickenings at column-slab intersections—have shown promise in addressing these deficiencies by enhancing both structural stiffness and energy dissipation capacity. Despite these potential advantages, comprehensive evaluations of their global seismic performance under combined gravity and lateral loads remain limited. This study presents a comparative nonlinear static pushover analysis of two four-story reinforced concrete (RC) building models—with and without drop panels—conducted using Extended Three-Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems (ETABS) Nonlinear v9.7.4. The structural design followed Indonesian National Standard (SNI), specifically SNI 1726:2019 (seismic load requirements), SNI 1727:2020 (minimum live loads), SNI 2847:2019 (concrete structural detailing), and General Building Code Regulation (PUBG) 1983 (dead load guidelines). A triangular lateral load distribution was applied incrementally to evaluate structural responses. The results indicate that the inclusion of drop panels led to a shorter fundamental period (0.7493 s), higher base shear capacity (5,750 kN), and lower maximum roof displacement (340 mm), compared to the model without drop panels (0.8380 s, 5,500 kN, and 380 mm, respectively). Furthermore, the drop panel model maintained story drift ratios below 2%, complying with seismic code limits, and demonstrated improved plastic hinge distribution concentrated within Immediate Occupancy (IO) and life safety (LS) performance levels. Although the ductility ratio was slightly lower, the overall energy dissipation capacity improved due to more uniform hinge development. These findings confirm that drop panels represent a cost-effective and structurally efficient solution to enhance the seismic performance of RC flat slab systems.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Explorationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesISSN;2394-5443-
dc.subjectFlat slab systemsen_US
dc.subjectDrop panelsen_US
dc.subjectSeismic performanceen_US
dc.subjectPushover analysisen_US
dc.subjectReinforced concrete structuresen_US
dc.subjectETABS simulationen_US
dc.titleEnhancing seismic resilience: the role of drop panels in building structures using pushover analysisen_US
dc.title.alternativeMeningkatkan ketahanan seismik: peran drop panel pada struktur bangunan menggunakan analisis pushoveren_US
dc.typeKarya Tulis Dosenen_US
Appears in Collections:Published Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Enhancing seismic resilience the role of drop panels in building structures using pushover analysis.pdf
  Restricted Access
Journal Article683.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.