Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositori.uma.ac.id/handle/123456789/31208
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSembiring, Zulfikar-
dc.contributor.authorRani, Khairul Najmy Abdul-
dc.contributor.authorAmir, Amiza-
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-10T02:18:23Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-10T02:18:23Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-04-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.uma.ac.id/handle/123456789/31208-
dc.description28 Pagesen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) architecture model is used to analyse and compare the seven most widely used first-order stochastic gradient-based optimization algorithms. Adaptive Moment Estimation (ADAM), Root Mean Square Propagation (RMSprop), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Adaptive Gradient (AdaGrad), Adaptive Delta (AdaDelta), Nesterov-accelerated Adaptive Moment Estimation (NADAM), and Maximum Adaptive Moment Estimation (AdaMax) are the optimization techniques that have been studied. The study used the body motion datasets from the University of California-Irvine (UCI) Machine Learning (ML) datasets. This experiment demonstrates the capabilities of various combinations of optimizer models, long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture, activation functions, and learning rate. The main aim is to understand how good each optimizer performs in test accuracy and feasible training time behaviour over various learning rates and activation functions. The outcomes vary by setting, with some achieving higher accuracy and shorter training sessions than others. The AdaGrad model, which uses exponential and sigmoid activation functions with a learning rate of 0.001, has a training time of 17.1 minutes and a test accuracy of 78.31%, making it the top-performing configuration. The exponential function is an activation function that consistently outperforms other models and optimization algorithms. It consistently delivers high accuracy and minimal running time across numerous models and optimizers, while the Softmax activation function continuously underperforms.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPERTANIKAen_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectactivation functionen_US
dc.subjectbody motion datasetsen_US
dc.subjectgradient descent (GD)en_US
dc.subjectlearning rateen_US
dc.subjectlong short-term memory (LSTM)en_US
dc.subjectRecurrent Neural Network (RNN)en_US
dc.subjectrunning timeen_US
dc.titleA Comparative study of gradient descent methods in deep learning using body motion dataseten_US
dc.title.alternativeA Comparative study of gradient descent methods in deep learning using body motion dataseten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Published Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A Comparative study of gradient descent methods in deep learning using body motion dataset.pdf
  Restricted Access
Journal Article1.35 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.