Penerapan hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Kabupaten Labuhan Batu (Studi Kasus di Kepolisisan Resor Labuhan Batu)

Abstract

Corruption in this country are in a worrying situation. Acts of corruption occur in a variety of areas, ranging from the big city to the country. Ranging from government officials, private sector, to parking attendants all do corruption. Shame and guilt with pride all proceeds covered the sacrilege. No wonder the international community to put this country as one of the most corrupt countries in the world. Type of research in this thesis is a normative legal research. This study aims to examine the legal arrangements concerning corruption. To assess the implementation of crime prevention police corruption Resort Labuan Batu and to assess the application of the law against the decision of the District Court of Rantau Prapat against corruption Health Department. Legal arrangements concerning corruption regulated in Law Number 20 Year 2001 Changing Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 Year 1999 on Eradication of Corruption. Law is born because of corruption that has been widespread, not only financial harm the country, but also has been a violation of the rights of social and economic society at large, so that corruption eradication is classified as a crime that is done outside usual. Implementation of crime prevention police corruption committed Labuan Batu resort. Number of corruption cases handled by Police Resort Labuan Batu last three years is three (3) cases. The obstacles faced by police Resort Labuan Batu one of them is 1) corruption generally do some people both individually and collectively, so that overlap among the actors in the act. 2) Cases of corruption are generally very difficult in said, because the timing of the reports take a long time. 3) The most common offenders are the boss of the witnesses, so it is difficult to reveal the witness facts. Efforts were made one of which is to coordinate with the employer to facilitate access to potential suspects obtain supporting evidence. Application of the law against the decision of the District Court of Rantau Prapat against corruption Health Department. Judges issued the verdict to the accused who pleaded not guilty are not right. Judges should see the results of the audit conducted by BPK Representative of North Sumatra Province which states there are indications of state losses of Rp. 1.768.225.182, - (one billion, seven hundred and sixty depalan million two hundred and twenty-five thousand one hundred and eighty-two dollars). It is also expressed in the fact that the expert testimony of law by a named Mangahu Raja Siagian. Other facts are presented witness testimony verbalissant, who explained that many signed blank receipts. Acquittal issued by the panel of judges is not right.