Analisis Terhadap Putusan Majelis Hakim dalam Tindak Pidana Pemaksaan secara Bersama-Sama (Studi Putusan Nomor: 388/Pid.B/2016/PN.Mdn)

Abstract

Coercion is one of the most difficult phenomena to be lost in people's lives, coercive actions that often occur such as beatings and physical violence or using firearms.Analysis of the decision of the panel of judges in coercion of coercion together is all efforts to fulfill the rights and the provision of assistance to provide a sense of security to the victim that must be carried out by a protection institution or other institution in accordance with the provisions of the legislation.Which applies to article 335 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code.The problems in this study are about the legal consequences of coercive victims, and the legal protection of coercive victims together, and the judge's judgment in imposing penalties on coercive behavior together on the decision Number : 388/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Mdn. The theory used in research is the theory of legal certainty and the theory of justice. Research Methods in Writing This is a method of Normative Juridical researchers who collect library data, namely laws and regulations, law books, judge decisions, mass media, and scientific journals related to the problems discussed in this thesis. The results and discussion of this research is about the legal protection of victims of coercive crime jointly based on decision Number: 388/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Mdn this is only a provision of restitution and punishment based on the principle or theory of justice is unfair, and judges' consideration is to pay attention to mitigating and burdensome matters and to observe the absence of justification and forgiveness.