Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repositori.uma.ac.id/handle/123456789/9749
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Hidayani, Sri | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Mubarak, Ridho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Napitupulu, Ruben Arjuna | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-04T02:53:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-04T02:53:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-09-22 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositori.uma.ac.id/handle/123456789/9749 | - |
dc.description | Hakim adalah aparat penegak hukum yang paling dominan dalam melaksanakan penegakan hukum yang menentukan putusan terhadap suatu perkara yang disandarkan pada intelektual, moral, dan integritas hakim terhadap nilai-nilai keadilan. Memang sulit mengukur putusan hakim yang bagaimana memenuhi rasa keadilan itu. Salah satu indikator yang dapat memenuhi rasa keadilan atau tidak antara lain dapat ditemukan didalam pertimbangan hakim yang merupakan dasar argumentasi hakim dalam memutuskan suatu perkara. Rumusan masalah dalam skripsi ini adalah bagaimana Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap perjudian dan bagaimana Pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku perjudian dalam Putusan Nomor 228/Pid.B/2017/PN.BLG. Pada penulisan skripsi ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif melalui studi pustaka. Sumber hukum dalam penulisan skripsi ini adalah bahan hukum primer, yaitu undang-undang, bahan hukum sekunder yaitu buku yang relevan dan putusan pengadilan nomor 228/Pid.B/2017/PN.BLG, serta bahan hukum sekunder yang bersumber dari skripsi, artikel, tesis, majalah, internet, dan lain-lain. Dan penulis melakukan penelitian di Pengadilan Negeri Balige yakni melakukan wawancara langsung dengan Hakim yang terkait didalam putusan. Hasil yang dicapai dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana perjudian dalam putusan nomor 228/Pid.B/2017/PN.BLG sangatlah ringan, diharapkan penerapan suatu hukuman pada tindak pidana perjudian ini perlu diberikan hukuman yang berat, yang akan berakibat timbulnya efek jera bagi pelaku maupun masyarakat lain agar tidak terjadinya tindak pidana perjudian ini. Pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana perjudian dalam perkara Nomor: 228/Pid.B/2017/PN.BLG dalam pertimbangan hakim lebih mengutamakan perbaikan diri terhadap terdakwa, karena berbagai pertimbangan hakim memberikan kesempatan untuk memperbaiki diri agar kelak tidak mengulangi lagi perbuatan-perbuatan yang melanggar hukum. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Judges are the most dominant law enforcement officers in carrying out law enforcement that determine decisions against a case based on the intellectual, moral and integrity of judges on the values of justice. It is indeed difficult to measure the judge's decision on how to fulfill that sense of justice. One indicator that can fulfill a sense of justice or not can be found among other things in the judgment of a judge which is the basis of the judge's argument in deciding a case. The formulation of the problem in this study is criminal responsibility for gambling and judges' consideration in imposing a criminal sanction on gamblers in Decision Number: 228/Pid.B/2017/PN.BLG. In this thesis writing using normative juridical research method through literature study. Legal sources in the writing of this thesis are primary legal materials, namely the Law, secondary legal material, namely the relevant books and court decisions number: 228/Pid.B/2017/PN.BLG, as well as secondary legal materials originating from the thesis, articles, thesis, magazine, internet, and others. And the author conducted a study in the Balige District Court which was to conduct a direct interview with the Judge involved in the decision. The results achieved in this study indicate that criminal liability against perpetrators of gambling in the decision number: 228/Pid.B/2017/PN.BLG is very light, it is expected that the application of a penalty on this gambling crime needs to be given a severe punishment, which will result in the emergence of a deterrent effect for the perpetrators and other communities so as not to commit this gambling crime. Judges 'consideration in imposing a criminal offense against a gambling criminal in case No: 228/Pid.B/ 2017/PN.BLG in the consideration of the judge prioritizing self-improvement against the defendant, because various judges' considerations provide an opportunity to improve themselves so that they will not repeat their actions. actions that violate the law. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | id | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universitas Medan Area | en_US |
dc.subject | pertimbangan hakim | en_US |
dc.subject | sanksi pidana | en_US |
dc.subject | tindak pidana perjudian | en_US |
dc.subject | judicial considerations | en_US |
dc.subject | criminal sanctions | en_US |
dc.subject | gambling crimes | en_US |
dc.title | Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak PIdana Perjudian (Studi Putusan Nomor: 228/Pid.B/2017/PN.BLG) | en_US |
dc.type | Skripsi Sarjana | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | SP - Criminal Law |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ruben Arjuna Napitupulu - Fulltext.pdf | Fulltext | 1 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.