Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalaguna Narkotika (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sidikalang Nomor 4/Pid Sus Anak/2023/PN.Sdk)

Abstract

Tindak pidana yang dilakukan anak menjadi masalah serius di Indonesia, sehingga dibutuhkan penanganan khusus melalui sistem peradilan pidana anak. Negara wajib melindungi dan mendidik anak pelaku tindak pidana agar mereka tidak mengulangi perbuatannya. Hakim dalam Putusan telah menerapkan Pasal 112 Ayat (1) Undang Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika Juncto dan Undang Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Disamping itu, penerapan sanksi pidana dalam perkara terdakwa anak nomor 4/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN.Sdk, dalam hal ini sudah sesuai dengan menjatuhkan pidana penjara Selama 11 bulan dan Pelatihan Kerja selama 5 bulan kepada anak dalam Pertimbangan Hakim Terdapat dua yaitu yuridis Seperti Dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut umum, Barang bukti, keterangan saksi, pengakuan anak, serta hasil dari laboratorium yang menyatakan anak positif Methamfetamina sedanganka Non yuridis Hakim mempertimbang kan seperti Kondisi Terdakwa, Motif dan Tujuan dilakukan tindak pidana, usia Anak , Riwayat anak, anak belum pernah dihukum, anak Mengakui kesalahanya dan Menyesal. Criminal acts committed by children are a serious problem in Indonesia, so special handling is needed through the juvenile criminal justice system. The state is obliged to protect and educate child perpetrators of crimes so that they do not repeat their actions. The judge in the decision has applied Article 112 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics Juncto and the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System In addition, the application of criminal sanctions in the case of the child defendant number 4 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2023 / PN.Sdk, in this case is in accordance with imposing a prison sentence of 11 months and 5 months of Job Training to the child in the Judge's Consideration There are two, namely legal such as the Public Prosecutor's Charge, Evidence, witness statements, the child's confession, and the results of the laboratory stating that the child is positive for Methamphetamine, while the non-legal Judge considers such as the Defendant's Condition, Motive and Purpose of committing the crime, the child's age, the child's history, the child has never been convicted, the child admits his guilt and regrets it.