Hubungan antara Kompensasi dengan Motivasi Kerja Guru di SMA Negeri 1 Tanjung Morawa

Abstract

This study aims to determine and test empirically to know the relationship between Competation and Work Motivation in Teachers of SMA Negeri 1 Tg. Morawa The sample in this study were 57 teachers. Sampling using a total sampling technique. With the hypothesis there is a positive relationship between Compensation and Work Motivation, assuming the better the Compensation, the work motivation will increase or vice versa the lower the Compensation the worse Work Motivation. The data collection method uses a work motivation scale according to Munandar (2001) explaining aspects of work motivation are: The existence of discipline from employees, high imagination and power of combination, self-confidence, resistance to pressure, employee reaction to emotional experience, responsibility in doing work and compensation scale based on aspects of compensation according to Prakoso (2011), namely: Direct financial compensation, indirect financial compensation, non financial compensation, From the results of statistical analysis of product moment correlations it is known that: There is a positive relationship between Compensation and Work Motivation, assuming the better the Compensation the Work motivation will increase or vice versa the lower the Compensation the Work Motivation will get worse, where rxy = 0.388 with a significant p = 0.000 <0.050. This means that the proposed hypothesis is declared accepted. The determinant coefficient (r2) of the relationship between the independent variable X and the dependent variable Y is equal to r2 = 0,150. Compensation contributed to motivation by 15.0%. Based on the results of empirical and hypothetical mean values, it can be concluded that the compensation received is relatively high because the average hypothetical value of 70 is smaller than the average value of empiric 79.37 and work motivation received is high because the average hypothetical value of 67 , 5 is smaller than the empirical mean value of 74.39