Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Oli Kendaraan Bermotor (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Yogyakarta No.465/PID.B/2010/PN.YK.)

Abstract

One aspect that became the legal liability of this research study is the responsibility of the criminal counterfeiting oil . Location of criminal responsibility in the crime of forgery oil is essentially an act of delivering a product to the public in the form of oil where the oil quality is not as good as the labels attached . The oil adulteration act is an act that is harmful to consumers on the one hand and hurt the government on the other. The problem posed in this study is how the form of legal protection given to consumers of motor vehicles against oil adulteration done by businesses , how the criminal accountability of business actors in the oil adulteration of motor vehicles associated with the Yogyakarta District Court No. 465/Pid.B/2010/PN.YK, and how the legal reasoning in the Decision No. law judge. 465/Pid.B/2010/Pn.YK about the crime of falsification of a motor vehicle oil. To address these problems the normative juridical analysis where the discussion was done by researching legal materials associated with the proposed title. The results of the research and discussion to explain the form of legal protection given to consumers of motor vehicles against oil adulteration done by businesses is by providing criminal penalties for businesses that do not implement the conditions set . Neither the Criminal Code nor the Consumer Protection Act. In addition to the legal form of protection in accordance with the statutory provisions in force then other forms of legal protection is to provide oversight of oil products circulating in the community. Criminal responsibility of business actors in the oil adulteration of motor vehicles associated with the Yogyakarta District Court No. 465/Pid.B/2010/PN.YK are criminal sanctions for the consequences of the defendant's legal action in the form of imprisonment for 7 months jail term cut. Legal considerations of law in the Decision No. judges. 465/Pid.B/2010/Pn.YK about the crime of falsification of a motor vehicle oil is a fulfillment of the element section indicted the defendant, that the judges did not find things that can be used as an excuse or justification on the defendant himself, and it mitigating and aggravating defendant.